Close Menu
Machinery Asia
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • Shopping
  • News & Media
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Machinery Asia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • Shopping
  • News & Media
Machinery Asia
You are at:Home » The client tells the contractor to apologize for using Kingspan insulation board
Industry News

The client tells the contractor to apologize for using Kingspan insulation board

Machinery AsiaBy Machinery AsiaJuly 18, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Tumblr

A contractor has been told to remove insulation from balconies and apologize to residents after breaching a local ban on using Kingspan products.

It has emerged that earlier this month, Kent-based Lawtech was told to remove the product it had installed on 16 balconies at the Adair and Hazlewood tower blocks in North Kensington.

The contractor had been working on a £7m repair project to the towers, which involves removing their external rendering systems.

In 2021, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea said it would not allow any contractor to use products made by Kingspan on any of its projects, after allegations about the company’s conduct emerged during the tower inquiry Grenfell on the 2017 fire at the building.

Kim Taylor-Smith, Grenfell’s senior councilor for housing and social investment, said last week that after officers identified the Kingspan product on July 7, she instructed Lawtech to “remove it immediately”. .

“This has now been done and will be replaced by the originally specified product, Rockwool,” he said.

“Lawtech’s use of Kingspan is an absolute breach of our instruction and trust. I am deeply disappointed and have asked for a full explanation of how this happened. I hope Lawtech apologizes to our residents.

“We made a public commitment in 2021 that the council would no longer contract with Kingspan, nor would we allow our contractors to subcontract with them or allow their use by any subcontractor on any council project. We stand by that commitment.”

The council’s ban followed allegations made about the conduct of material suppliers Kingspan, Arconic and Celotex, as well as contractor Rydon, during the investigation. He said he would no longer work with or use products made by either company. His position should be reviewed after the final report of the investigation has been published. This is now expected to be in 2024.

Grenfell United, the group representing bereaved families and survivors, said the guardian: “We are disgusted that once again contractors like Lawtech have shown complete disregard and allowed Kingspan product back into the homes of social housing tenants in Kensington and Chelsea. The lack of oversight that allowed this to happen is extremely worrying.”

Lawtech has been approached for comment.

Company statement supplied to the My London The website said: “The installation was in an isolated area and was removed on the same day that inspections identified Kingspan brand insulation board. The use of Kingspan boards was an isolated error and these boards have not been used anywhere else in the works.”

The contractor added that the Kingspan mineral wool boards that had been used were A1 non-combustible and equivalent to approved Rockwool insulation. “[The boards] it posed no risk to any residents. However, Lawtech fully accepts this [the council’s] “Unfortunately, the product use ban was breached in this isolated incident, which was immediately identified and quickly rectified,” he said.

Kingspan has been approached for comment.

During the investigation, material suppliers, including Kingspan, were accused of trying to “game the system” by “putting unsafe products on the market”. He has done it before said: “Kingspan did not supply or recommend the use of its K15 insulation in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower, which represented only 5% of the insulation layer purchased for use and was totally unsuitable for use in a cladding system with an ACM with a polyethylene core.”

Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleMace’s profits fall due to loan impairment
Next Article The power of collision warning systems to safeguard construction workers
Machinery Asia
  • Website

Related Posts

From the Archive: August 16, 1984

May 23, 2026

Black & Veatch plans $1.34 million headquarters and mixed-use district in Kansas

May 23, 2026

D.C. agency chief defends pre-spill maintenance, but system repair far from over

May 22, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
Don't Miss

From the Archive: August 16, 1984

Black & Veatch plans $1.34 million headquarters and mixed-use district in Kansas

D.C. agency chief defends pre-spill maintenance, but system repair far from over

Construction views to the east | Engineering News-Register

Popular Posts

From the Archive: August 16, 1984

May 23, 2026

Black & Veatch plans $1.34 million headquarters and mixed-use district in Kansas

May 23, 2026

D.C. agency chief defends pre-spill maintenance, but system repair far from over

May 22, 2026

Construction views to the east | Engineering News-Register

May 22, 2026
Heavy Machinery

What are the most durable materials used in the construction of car trailers

May 13, 2026

Which open vs enclosed car trailer makes sense for you

May 13, 2026

How to secure a car on a trailer safely step by step

April 30, 2026

Folding car trailer buying guide for small garage and easy storage

April 27, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.