Close Menu
Machinery Asia
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • Shopping
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Machinery Asia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • Shopping
Machinery Asia
You are at:Home » HS2 uncertainty is “alarming and destabilizing”, industry warns
Industry News

HS2 uncertainty is “alarming and destabilizing”, industry warns

Machinery AsiaBy Machinery AsiaSeptember 25, 2023No Comments8 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Tumblr

Construction leaders have warned the government that scrapping Phase 2 of High Speed ​​​​2 would have “serious implications” for the UK economy.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is expected to derail or postpone the HS2 extension from Birmingham to Manchester amid concerns over the cost of the project. This morning (September 25) Sunak once again refused to support Phase 2 during an interview with BBC News.

The possible scrapping of Phase 2, which also includes a route from west London (Old Oak Common) to central London (Euston), has been met with horror by construction executives, who warned on Friday ( 22 September) that they “cannot exaggerate how damaging” the changes to the scope of HS2 are.

Senior executives from Mace, Skanska and VolkerRail were signatories to an open letter (see in full, below) of the construction industry to the government, asking it to support Phase 2 of HS2. Other signatories include executives from consultancies such as Aecom, Arcadis and Atkinsréalis, as well as High Speed ​​​​1, British Steel and the Railway Industry Association.

“The renewed speculation over the past week has been deeply alarming and destabilizing for the industry as a whole,” the letter says.

“It is a special blow to the 30,000 people who work to deliver this vital infrastructure every day, and the thousands of businesses in the North West who are currently investing in the area based on HS2 coming to Manchester.

“Discarding [the government’s commitment to HS2 phase 2] it will now have serious implications for the UK economy.”

The letter added: “Perhaps most important of all, from a business perspective, these constant changes to a flagship infrastructure project add to the perceived risk of the UK as a place to do business, as well as adding to the cost of each and every infrastructure project in the future.

“At a time when we have to compete globally more strongly than ever and we have to provide infrastructure more efficiently than in the past, we cannot overstate how damaging this is.”

Speculation that the route between Birmingham and Manchester could be scrapped or delayed arose earlier this month, after pictures emerged suggesting the Prime Minister and Chancellor were discussing the costs of continuing the scheme.

Sunak has not confirmed its commitment to the full HS2 route. He is expected to make an announcement this week, ahead of the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester this weekend.

Former transport secretary Grant Schapps told the BBC on Sunday (September 24) that going ahead with the plan would be “irresponsible” in the face of rising costs.

The alleged change of plans has faced backlash from a spectrum of business and political leaders.

John Armitt, chairman of the National Infrastructure Commission, told the BBC on Saturday (September 23) that capping HS2 would be a “tragedy”, telling the government: “You control costs, you don’t run at the first blow of shots.

“You dive in and address these cost issues and deal with them on a daily basis throughout the project.”

Gordon Brown, whose Labor government originally proposed HS2, said: “Every country in Europe is doing high-speed rail.

“It is becoming the norm rather than the exception, and Britain is in danger of having 19th-century solutions to 21st-century problems.”

Sunak has also faced backlash from his own party. Former cabinet members George Osborne and Michael Heseltine wrote in the times that scrapping the line in Manchester would be a “serious act of vandalism”.

Full: letter from industry to government

Dear Prime Minister and Chancellor,

We are writing as representatives of 21 companies, who collectively employ thousands of people across the UK, to urge you to end the speculation and recommit to HS2 from Manchester to Euston. All the companies signing below are either based here or have substantial, long-term commitments to invest in and support the UK economy.

As you know, nothing is more important in business than certainty and trust. This is the basis on which we invest and grow, and the basis on which we employ people and develop their skills. Our growth supports the government’s pledge to take office last year to grow the economy and create better paying jobs.

As such, it was welcomed when each, as Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer respectively, took office and gave clarity and certainty to HS2, the country’s biggest public infrastructure investment project. The project already employs around 30,000 people, most of whom work in our UK-based companies and SME supply chains.

Delivering great infrastructure properly means making a long-term commitment, giving certainty to the companies that build it, and planning to rely on it well into the future. In the Autumn Statement, just 10 months ago, the Chancellor unequivocally committed to Phase 2 of HS2, stating that “smart countries build on their long-term commitments rather than scrap them. .. so today I am confirming that… we will deliver… HS2 in Manchester.”

We agree that you were right to make this long-term commitment. Scrapping it now will have serious implications for the UK economy. As more uncertainty emerged around HS2 earlier this year, the Chancellor stepped in again to provide certainty and business confidence. When asked if HS2 would come to Euston, the chancellor insisted he saw “no conceivable circumstances” that it would not.

Over the years, Prime Minister, you have also been clear in your support for HS2. In March this year you told the Liaison Committee: “I think it’s important that we take on the big infrastructure projects, that we do them right.”

In view of the above, the renewed speculation during the last week has been deeply alarming and destabilizing for the industry as a whole. It is a particular blow to the 30,000 people who work to deliver this vital infrastructure every day, and the thousands of North West businesses who are currently investing in the area based on HS2 coming to Manchester.

The UK’s reputation as a place to invest and do business has already suffered in recent years. Statements by some politicians have had the effect of undermining the UK’s reputation for certainty, trust and predictability in decision-making in our country. Together, you have both worked hard to address these reputational challenges since taking office a year ago.

This hard work would be undone if the rug was pulled from under HS2. The scope of the project has already changed three times in the last three years, with the eastern section being withdrawn, the Golborne link being removed and then certain works being postponed for two years. Each change in scope adds to the costs: the two-year postponement alone will cost at least £380m, with 100 jobs already cut as a result of the decision. At the same time, it reduces the benefits of the scheme, weakening the business case.

Perhaps most important of all, from a business perspective, these constant changes to a flagship infrastructure project add to the perceived risk of the UK as a place to do business, as well as adding to the cost of each and every infrastructure projects in the future. . At a time when we must compete globally more forcefully than ever and must provide infrastructure more efficiently than in the past, we cannot overstate how damaging this is.

We urge you to move urgently to quell the speculation and reaffirm your commitment to the delivery of HS2 Phase 2, from Manchester to Euston in full, to sustain the growth in the widespread economic benefits that this project is already delivering.

Your

Colin Wood, CEO of Aecom

Alan Brookes, Global Managing Director of Arcadis

Richard Robinson, CEO UK and Europe, Atkinsréalis

Xijun Cao, Chairman and CEO of British Steel

Chris Rumfitt, CEO of Field Consulting

Nigel Milton, Head of Cabinet and Carbon, Heathrow

Dyan Crowther, Chief Executive, High Speed ​​1

Michael Hird, Chairman and Owner, Hird Group

Darren James, CEO of Keltbray

Paul Goodhand, Managing Director of Knorr-Bremse Rail Systems (UK) Ltd

William Wilson, CEO of Linbrooke Services Ltd

Mark Reynolds, Group Chairman and CEO of Mace Group

Charlie Cornish, Group Chief Executive, Manchester Airports Group

Darren Caplan, chief executive of the Rail Industry Association

Lucy Prior MBE, Chair, Railway Industry Association SME Group

James Bain, Chief Operating Officer Europe, Worldline and President, Rail Supply Group

Rob Morris and Sambit Banerjee, Joint CEOs of Siemens Mobility

Thomas Faulkner, Executive Vice President of Skanska UK

Nick Salt, CEO of Systra

Andy Bell, vice president of Thales GTS UK

Alan Robertson, Chairman, VolkerRail

Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleWhy you should rethink what you know about construction safety
Next Article Amazon commits $3.5 million to data centers in Ohio
Machinery Asia
  • Website

Related Posts

Prices of construction materials fell slightly in December, but were still up from more than a year ago

January 31, 2026

Court rules Cook County misused $243 million in transportation funds

January 31, 2026

Construction views to the east | Engineering News-Register

January 31, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
Don't Miss

Prices of construction materials fell slightly in December, but were still up from more than a year ago

Court rules Cook County misused $243 million in transportation funds

Construction views to the east | Engineering News-Register

Oglethorpe Power selects Kiewit unit as EPC for $2.5 million Georgia gas-fired power plant

Popular Posts

Prices of construction materials fell slightly in December, but were still up from more than a year ago

January 31, 2026

Court rules Cook County misused $243 million in transportation funds

January 31, 2026

Construction views to the east | Engineering News-Register

January 31, 2026

Oglethorpe Power selects Kiewit unit as EPC for $2.5 million Georgia gas-fired power plant

January 30, 2026
Heavy Machinery

Car hauler trailer kit basics for real world towing

January 26, 2026

Hydraulic tilting gooseneck trailer for transporting heavy equipment

January 26, 2026

Aluminum car trailer with tilt bed explained for real world vehicle transport

January 26, 2026

What is the best cover for a car trailer?

January 23, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.