Federal funding for the $16 billion Hudson Tunnel project was restarted at 5 p.m. on February 12 unless the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals intervened. When the term ends, an order goes into effect to restore government funding.
The five-day pause was a compromise by U.S. District Court Judge Jeannette A. Vargas, who on Feb. 9 denied the federal government’s request to stay its Feb. 6 temporary restraining order, but allowed a short administrative delay until 5 p.m. Thursday to give the government time to call for emergency aid. No stay was issued, so the TRO remains in effect.
RELATED
Gateway Project Officials Ask Feds For More Than $16 Million To Freeze Hudson Tunnel Funding
The Feb. 6 TRO ruling prevents the U.S. Department of Transportation from continuing a months-long freeze on federal disbursements tied to the $16 billion rail megaproject — no federal funds have been disbursed since Sept. 30 — that New York and New Jersey argued would force the shutdown of work without immediate funding. The project includes the construction of a new two-tube rail tunnel under the Hudson River and the rehabilitation of the 116-year-old North River Tunnel, a key rail link between New Jersey and Manhattan.
As of late Feb. 12, the Second Circuit docket (No. 26-282) showed no order granting a stay.
“This is good news for the Hudson Tunnel project, and we anticipate receiving the $205 million in reimbursement funds from the federal government,” the Gateway Development Corporation said in a Feb. 12 statement. “While this is a positive step, we need consistent and reliable access to federal funding for the Hudson Tunnel project, the statement continues to move forward.”
GDC said it would “pursue all avenues” to regain access to the agreed amount obligated by USDOT and stressed its confidence that the project is on a firm legal basis to prevail.
Looking for quick answers on construction and engineering topics?
Try Ask ENR, our new intelligent AI search tool.
Ask ENR →
In weighing the government’s request, Vargas acknowledged federal claims that up to $200 million could be disbursed before appellate review, but concluded that the balance of damages and public interest favored allowing relief. The court cited evidence that work had already been suspended, layoffs had begun, and a prolonged delay could cause serious regional economic damage.
“States have demonstrated limited ability to continue a critical infrastructure project out of their own coffers,” the court wrote in its order denying USDOT’s request despite the brief allowance for appellate review. “Plaintiffs will not be able to recover imminent and ‘overwhelming’ monetary loss if GDC is forced to close its operations.”
The federal government has argued that the dispute belongs in the US Court of Federal Claims, saying the states’ claims amount to contract enforcement outside the scope of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Meanwhile, the Gateway Development Commission has filed a separate breach of contract case in this court seeking payment of allegedly overdue amounts.
In the absence of an appeal, the district court’s order goes into effect Thursday evening. Any subsequent decision by the Second Circuit, which remains possible, could change that stance.
