Tutor Perini sees “significant project opportunities” but liquidation drags on profits

Listen to the article
6 minutes

This audio is automatically generated. Please let us know if you have any comments.

The trick as an infrastructure contractor today is not necessarily finding enough work to make a living. It’s also about settling disputes with your landlords and getting paid for the work when you’re done.

This is a takeaway Call for results of the second term of tutor Perini last week. The Los Angeles-based contractor reported revenue of $1.1 billion, up 10% from the same period in 2023, and a profit of $812,000, compared with a loss of $37.5 million a year ago . The $10.42 billion portfolio was down 4% from the $10.86 billion the company had at the end of the second half of 2023.

The company’s earnings were negatively impacted by $12.4 million due to an unfavorable adjustment due to a settlement of two Northeast highway projects that were already completed, as well as the earnings per share impact of prior stock compensation awards.

Ron Tutor, the company’s outgoing CEO who will step down in January, noted his own dissatisfaction with the company’s results.

“Although disappointed with our earnings per share, I think we explained the unforeseen events that led to the reduction,” he told investment analysts on an Aug. 1 conference call to discuss the second-quarter numbers .

Lots of work, little competition

At the same time, Tutor said the company is still seeing plenty of opportunities to bid on megaprojects worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, often with little competition.

“This limited competition is the result of an imbalance between supply and demand,” Tutor said. “Frankly, there are so many major project opportunities and a small pool of contractors with the physical and financial resources to prequalify, successfully bid, bond and execute those projects.”

Tutor said the momentum would bode well for the company and allow it to expand its profit margins as it dictates the terms of deals, such as initial funding of jobs.

“Our position is very simple,” Tutor said. “We will not accept onerous conditions in any job. And in the last two years … we’ve been able to force them to recognize the need for mobilization on the theory that we work with their dollars, and not our dollars.”

Big projects, big disputes

Tutor Perini’s findings show that while there are many opportunities for contractors large enough to bid on multibillion-dollar projects, work contracted through traditional bid-building methods often results in years of litigation that can hang over the years from the heads of the contractors after the work was completed.

This has certainly been the case for Tutor Perini in recent years, which has had ups and downs as it has resolved disputes over past contracts, sometimes with positive results and sometimes, as in the second trimester, with negatives.

Indeed, in the company’s 10-Q filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission accompanying its results, said that while it took a negative impact from the latest job in the second quarter, it expected to take cash from the same settlement next quarter.

“For example, cash collection associated with the aforementioned settlement of two completed civil segment highway projects in the Northeast is expected to have a significant positive impact on cash generated from operations in the third quarter of the company,” the company’s report says.

Asked by analysts how much that payment would be, Gary Smalley, president of Tutor Perini who will succeed Tutor, said “it was more than insignificant.”

New victories

The company’s approach stands in stark contrast to Tutor Perini’s California-based peer Granite Construction, which has taken an alternative strategy. Granite executives stood out in its recent call for the second quarter how they are pursuing smaller jobs that use progressive “best value” contract delivery methods to limit disputes over jobs and reduce their risks.