Close Menu
Machinery Asia
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • News & Media
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Machinery Asia
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Industry News
  • Heavy Machinery
  • Backhoe Loader
  • Excavators
  • Skid Steer
  • Videos
  • News & Media
Machinery Asia
You are at:Home » Wates and Morgan Sindall’s doppelgangers ordered a name change
Industry News

Wates and Morgan Sindall’s doppelgangers ordered a name change

Machinery AsiaBy Machinery AsiaOctober 9, 2023No Comments2 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Tumblr

Wates and Morgan Sindall have forced three companies using their identity to change their names, following an official complaint.

Wates Services Limited and Wates Contractor Limited were registered at Companies House in August and December 2022 respectively, and Morgan Sindall Limited was registered in January 2023.

The companies are not related to Wates Group or Morgan Sindall Group, and their registration would have prevented top contractors from using the names for the new subsidiaries.

Wates Group applied to the Business Names Tribunal in July to force Wates Contractor and Wates Services to change their names. Morgan Sindall Group submitted its application against Morgan Sindall Limited in May 2023.

The court ruled in favor of Wates Group and Morgan Sindall Group under the Companies Act 2006. The offending companies must change their names and pay £800 each to the CN100 contractors who complained.

The court also ruled that the separate individuals behind each of the infringing business names must “not cause or permit any measure to be taken calculated to cause another business to register under a name that is a offensive name”.

The Business Names Tribunal is part of the government’s Intellectual Property Office and deals with cases where someone registers a business name with the primary aim of preventing an existing business from using that identity.

Businesses can defend themselves if they can show that the name has been adopted in good faith or has been or is intended to be an operating business.

However, none of the offending companies in this case defended themselves.

Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleTop deals in London help Multiplex top the league table
Next Article Innovating in mental health, one conversation at a time
Machinery Asia
  • Website

Related Posts

Alabama’s long-delayed bridge project clears final funding hurdle

September 29, 2026

Job offers in the sector reached a six-month low

September 29, 2026

The $16 million Hudson Tunnel project is getting boring

September 29, 2026
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
Don't Miss

Alabama’s long-delayed bridge project clears final funding hurdle

Leaks and tractor-loader-backhoe shortage create restricted access at Waterfall Hills Retirement Estate

Job offers in the sector reached a six-month low

The $16 million Hudson Tunnel project is getting boring

Popular Posts

Alabama’s long-delayed bridge project clears final funding hurdle

September 29, 2026

Leaks and tractor-loader-backhoe shortage create restricted access at Waterfall Hills Retirement Estate

September 29, 2026

Job offers in the sector reached a six-month low

September 29, 2026

The $16 million Hudson Tunnel project is getting boring

September 29, 2026
Heavy Machinery

Custom trailers designed for the way you work

September 29, 2026

Daily Trailer Knowledge: Something About Trailer Tires

September 22, 2026

2 Place Car Trailer: How To Choose The Right Two Car Transporter For Vehicle Transport?

September 22, 2026

3-Car Wedge Trailer: How can it improve vehicle transportation efficiency?

September 21, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.